Gros Ventre – Vermentino, 2016

  • Basic info: Gros Venrtre Vermentino, El Dorado, CA, 2016.
  • Type: White
  • Price estimate: $23 (from online wine store (Chamber Street Wines – NYC wine store that also sells online)
  • Look: Pale yellow, translucent. Medium legs.
  • Smell: peach, fresh apricot and a vague honey smell.
  • Taste: Clean. Apple, mineral. Soft wine but has a nice tang.
  • Conclusions: Bob called this one of the best white wines he has ever had and I have to agree. It it stunning and really drinkable. It tastes incredibly smooth and light and while very different than the last two whites that we liked, it is one that I will look for again.
  • Other notes: I hate to admit it, but I think I am really getting back into white wines. The last three that we had I loved, and I can’t say the same for the reds. I love red wine, but now that I’m finding whites that are not as grapefruit-y, I am really enjoying them. I also loved the winery information on this one. They use sustainable farming practices and lean organic and bio-dynamic which you can taste the care in the wine. Once we drink down our current stock, I am probably going to try a few more from them.
  • From the bottle: No tasting notes on the bottle, but from the winery, “This Vermentino has been co-fermented with a touch of Picpoul Blanc, which brings bright, refreshing acidity to complement the minerality found on the palate. It offers notes of citrus leaf, lemon zest, white flowers, and a hint of Nashi pear.” 12.6% alcohol by volume.

IMG_20170430_180533

Garson – Tannat, 2015

  • Basic info: Garzon Tannat Reserve, Uruguay, 2015.
  • Type: Red
  • Price estimate: $20 (from local wine store)
  • Look: Deep, inky ruby color that sticks to the glass. Significant legs, probably high alcohol wine.
  • Smell: Dark cherry fuit.
  • Taste: Bitter on first sip. High tannin structure. Dark stone fruit, mineral and forest floor/leather.
  • Conclusions: This is a wine I had to taste over two days to really assess. The first day, it was super strong and all I really got was bitter. The second day was better, with the fruit coming trough more, but I still didn’t care for it. This might be the textbook definition of a “big, bold” wine and I can see lots of people liking it, but I’m not really one of them. With some decanting, I can drink it with food, but it is not one that I’m going to have a full glass of, much less a second glass.
  • Other notes: I think I’ve mentioned before that we belong to two wine clubs, one from Oregon where we get six bottles every six months, and one local wine club that is two bottles each month. This one of of the local wine club wines. I’m glad I tried it and it isn’t something I would ever pick up on my own, but I didn’t really like it. I found it bitter (but then again, I find broccoli bitter too) and thick. It paired ok with food and it was the first time I tried this varietal (or even heard of it) so that was something. When I did a little research, it turns out this varietal is known for the tannin structure – it is where the grape gets it’s name. If you like high tannin wines, you might like this, but this one was not for me.
  • From the bottle: No tasting notes on the bottle, but from the wine store, “A juicy full bodied wine. Rich purple in color with very fresh aromas reminiscent of red and black fruits. A strong impression on the mouth with tannins and mineralogy that transform into a wine with great local soil identity.” 14.5% alcohol by volume.

IMG_20170512_170100

Yes, that is Leia on the table. She hasn’t been feeling well lately and I don’t have the heart to kick her off unless we are eating. Poor kitty. But she does make the picture much more interesting.

Guillen – Pinot Noir, 2015

  • Basic info: Guillen – Esteban Pinot Noir, Willamette Valley, Oregon – 2015
  • Type: Red
  • Price estimate: $25 (wine club estimate – the winery does not seem to sell direct to the public, so I”m not sure how to acquire this one)
  • Look: Transluscent ruby red in color. Medium legs, prob. medium to high alcohol content.
  • Smell: dark fruit/cherry with a hint of mineral. Nutmeg.
  • Taste: Subtle, smooth, cherry. Very light tannin structure.
  • Conclusions:One of the best pinot noir ever. Super smooth and good depth of flavor. Lots of layers.
  • Other notes: This was one of our Oregon wine club wines. Bob and I get six bottles every six months, and we save them for our cheese night dinners each month. This has worked out really well for us – good wine, good cheese and usually good company. All of the notes for this wine are from Bob since I have an irritating cold and can’t smell much, and everything tastes off. Bob isn’t a huge pinot noir fan, he prefers bigger wines in general, but this is the second pinot from this club that he is gaga over. We actually ordered a half case of one from the last club shipment, and if I can figure out how to order this one, we may be getting another half case – after I recover from the cold and determine if I like it as much as he does.
  • From the bottle: No tasting notes on the bottle. From the club notes, “For being so young, the wine is drinking fabulously well but will certainly reward whatever patience you can muster for it. Black cherry, blackberry fruit along with the unmistakable baking spice component that comes from the whole cluster fermentation that Jesus carefully manages on the wine.” 13.5% alcohol by volume.

IMG_20170513_181352

Michael Picard – Vouvray, 2015

  • Basic info: Michael Picard, Chien Blanc, Vouvray, France, 2015
  • Type: White
  • Price estimate: $21 (at local wine store)
  • Look: Light yellow; transparent. Very few legs, probably lower alcohol.
  • Smell: Mainly wine with some lemon or citrus when it warmed up just a little. (Bob got lemon right away)
  • Taste: Crisp, slightly tart with a light texture. Green apple noticeable on the first sip. Very refreshing.
  • Conclusions: This wine may get me to drink more white wine. There was a smoothness to the wine that I didn’t expect. While tart, it wasn’t sour and it didn’t have the grapefruit overtones I don’t like. I may have to pick up a few more bottles of this for the summer.
  • Other notes: Our local wine store doesn’t shelve wine by grape, they shelve by category. The owners taste every wine in the store and decide if it is a big, bold wine, a fruity wine, a crisp wine, etc. When we did a wine tasting the other week, I had a wine that was in the same category and I loved it, but it was a little more than I wanted to spend on a bottle. Since this was in the same category, I decided to try it and I am so glad I did.
  • From the bottle: No tasting notes on the bottle, but from the website: “Off-dry in sweetness, this Chien Blanc has freshness on the palate with hint of apricot and stone fruit. Its hint of sweetness is counterbalanced by a high level of acidity making this a wine that is round and fresh easy to drink now or a wine that can age well.” 11.5% alcohol by volume.

IMG_20170421_184725

Alessio Komjanc – Cab Franc, 2014

  • Basic info:Alessio Komjanc Cab Franc, Collio, Italy, 2014.
  • Type: Red
  • Price estimate: $25 (at local wine store)
  • Look: Ruby in color, slightly translucent. Very few legs.
  • Smell: Cedar, pepper and mineral. (Bob got the pepper and mineral, and he agreed with the cedar after I said it)
  • Taste: Smooth and just a little effervescent. taste of black cherry and dark stone fruit with a decided mineral taste on the finish. Mild tannin.
  • Conclusions: I fully expected to hate this (Ed, I’m looking at all of the cab francs you had me try over the years), but I really liked it. It was far lighter in texture than I expected and the very slight bubbly feeling was surprising. I’m not sure  would seek this one out like I do zinfandels, but I won’t automatically dismiss the varietal like I once might have.
  • Other notes: This was one of our wine club wines and I hesitated to open it. I really put it off and just decided to open it and get it out of the way one day, and it was really good. We had it with dinner a few nights, but it wasn’t a wine I wanted to have a second glass of after dinner. I also think I have to learn what the “legs” on wine are supposed to look like at different alcohol levels because I feel like everything is looking the same, and the alcohol levels are definitely not the same.
  • From the bottle: No notes on the bottle, but from the website (translated into English): “Ruby red color tending towards violet. Intense, clearly herbaceous aroma that prevails over the fruity hints. Its flavor is full and decisive.” 12.5 – 13% alcohol by volume.

IMG_20170419_172809

Vino Nobile – 2013

  • Basic info:Vino Nobile, Di Montepulciano, Italy 2013
  • Type: Red Blend
  • Price estimate: $17 (at Total Wine)
  • Look:Ruby red in color. Somewhat translucent. No noticeable legs, possibly light alcohol.
  • Smell: Not much smell, but jammy with a hint of dark cherry.
  • Taste: Pepper, spice and some black fruit. Smooth wine with nice acidity. Bob noted mild tannins and a light mineral taste. He also got tobacco on the finish, which I didn’t get at all. Thin mouthfeel.
  • Conclusions: Good table wine. Very drinkable and it has a nice taste with not a lot of alcohol after taste to it. It is a little thin, but not bad at all. Solid wine.
  • Other notes: We still are not exactly sure what type of wine this is, but I’m thinking a sangiovese blend of some kind. It is a good wine to have with dinner, and will blend with a lot of different foods.
  • From the bottle: “A dry red wine with pleasant violet hues and a fresh and persistent bouquet. At the taste it has good freshness and tannin acid balance.” 13.5% alcohol by volume.

IMG_20170411_183506

Artezin – Zinfandel 2013

  • Basic info: Artezin, Zinfandel from Mendocino, CA, 2013
  • Type: Red Wine
  • Price estimate: $15 (at Total Wine)
  • Look: Dark ruby in color, not translucent. Medium viscosity, probably medium alcohol.
  • Smell: Wine. Maybe a little jam and blackberry (but it could also be that I want to smell those)
  • Taste: Jam leading to pepper. Round wine and very smooth. Really nice finish with just a little bit of tannin.
  • Conclusions: I really liked this wine when I opened it and I liked it even more the next day. It drinks really well and is easy to drink. You know there is alcohol there so you are not in danger of over drinking, but it is not enough to knock you out with a single glass.
  • Other notes: I really liked this wine for a few reasons. It is a zinfandel and I am really partial to zinfandels. It had a great body, but it wasn’t heavy and it is a wine that I could sip. Some wines I find have such low alcohol content that I just drink them this wine I could savor. It definitely drinks like a more expensive wine.
  • From the bottle: “This zinfandel offers varietal aromas of raspberry and boysenberry with notes of spice and black pepper.” 14.7% alcohol by volume.

IMG_20170412_194218

North Valley Chardonnay – 2013

  • Basic info: North Valley (Soter Vineyards) Chardonnay, Oregon, 2013
  • Type: White
  • Price estimate: $30 (from vineyard)
  • Look: Pale yellow in color. Very few legs evident
  • Smell: Coconut, pineapple, vanilla (Bob agreed on the smells, surprisingly.)
  • Taste: Pear and apple initially. (Bob got pina colada, which I got as a secondary taste, but he got it upfront.) Nice acidity, but still a soft wine. Long finish.
  • Conclusions: Love this wine. Great body – not heavy, oily or okay, but still soft and fuller than most white wines. The acidity is softened by the texture of the wine.
  • Other notes: Bob and I bought two bottles of this when we were in Oregon last summer and were saving them for a special occasion. I decided that we really should just drink a bottle since we had it, so we opened it. I don’t usually go for Chardonnay  (see first wine post) but both of us loved this one the fist time we had it, and it was just as good as we remembered this week.
  • From the bottle: No bottle notes on this one, but from the website: “Aromas of Meyer lemon, Asian pear, fresh apple with hints of vanilla bean, custard, hazelnut and a trace of match stick. Sleek and silky with a vibrant, juicy quality. Rich and mouth coating, the fresh fruit flavors are echoed on the palate with hints of stone fruit (white peach). There is an unmistakable mineral element on the finish as the flavors linger.” 13.4% alcohol by volume.

IMG_20170417_172517

Mellen-Meyer – Brut

  • Basic info: Mellen-Meyer, Brute, Willamette Valley, Oregon, no vintage
  • Type: Sparkling, white
  • Price estimate:$35 (from winery)
  • Look: pale yellow, light. Fine bubbles with low viscosity and few legs. Low to Medium alcohol.
  • Smell: Vanilla and wine. Bob smelled grapefruit.
  • Taste: Fine bubbles lead to great mouth feel. Dry, but not overly so.  Tastes reminiscent of hard apple cider – fruit, and citrus, but can’t tell which fruit or citrus specifically. Clean and refreshing. Bob called apricot and grapefruit on the taste, but I didn’t get those.
  • Conclusions: “Pitch perfect” was how Bob described this one. Probably one of the best sparkling wines we have ever had and that includes actual champagne. Not sweet, but not dry, it is refreshing and clean tasting. The bubbles are fun – fine, and not overpowering. If I had a party or occasion that called for sparkling wine, I’d try to get a case of this.
  • Other notes: Bob got excited when he saw this in our wine club shipment from Oregon. We only get six bottles every six months, but we love the different varieties and producers that we would not normally try as we live about as far from Oregon as you can get while still being in the U.S. We thought about saving this one, but decided to just open it and have it with our cheese box this month (see next post for more on that) and we are so glad we did. It went perfect with the rich cheeses and we loved every taste of this.
    • There are no tasting notes on the bottle but the wine club notes say, “it has a beautiful toasty biscotti nose with green apple and pear notes and a lively effervescence that creates a nice, fluffy mousse.”
  • From the bottle: “Brute, Willamette Valley AVA 35% Chardonnay & 65% Pino Noir. Disgorged Aug. 2, 2016, 315 cases” 12.5% alcohol by volume.

IMG_20170416_182610

I Vasari – Barba 2011

  • Basic info: I Vasari, Old Vines Montepulciano d’Abruzzo (Italy), Barba 2011
  • Type: Red
  • Price estimate: $15 (at Total Wine)
  • Look: Garnet, deep plum color. Some legs, maybe medium alcohol.
  • Smell: Jam.
  • Taste: Bright up front, rounding to a sour finish. Very tart and no fruit. Medium body. (Bob got sour up front and acerbic with some tannin and a little mineralogy.)
  • Conclusions: Not a good wine as it was just too sour. I’m not sure if we got a bad bottle or if that is the way the wine is supposed to taste, but neither of us finished a glass. Food did not help the flavor, either and the more I tried to drink it the less I liked it.
  • Other notes: Bob and I are usually pretty excited about Barbas and other slightly less known varietals, especially Italian wines. I wanted to like this wine, but it just didn’t taste good. Bob described it as having a “sticks and stems taste,” which I didn’t get, but then again, I was getting mostly sour and taste.
  • From the bottle: “Very intense ruby color, this wine denotes an intense and complex bouquet that combines cherry with different spice flavors, rich aroma with scents of black cherry, plum, blackberry.”  13.5% alcohol by volume.

*I should note that we get wine from a few places. We loved the Oregon wine so much when we went last summer, we joined a wine club that sends six bottles every six months. We still have about a dozen wines from our trip, most of which we are saving for special occasions. We also have a local wine club that is two bottles each month and we sometimes pick up a few bottles at that store. We do get most of our wine from the alcohol store (as we call it) because, well, it is convenient. So while most of the price estimates will be prices from Total Wine, not all of them will. Most of the wines I buy are between $15 and $30, with some a little lower and every now and then, higher. Also, yes, I tend to pick out the wine, but not always and it can be weeks from when I read the description or taste it in the store to when I open the bottle at home; I’m not reading the label or tasting notes before tasting and making my own notes.